Supplementary Files
Keywords
Implementation in AP Chemistry curriculum
Scientific research in high school
Development of soft skills
Teamwork
- Abstract 2
- PDF (Español) 0
- HTML (Español) 0
- ANEXOS (Español) 0
Abstract
For six years, the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in an advanced high school chemistry curriculum was evaluated using a concurrent mixed-methods study. Through surveys featuring open-ended questions and a Likert scale, the perceptions of both students and teachers were collected. Students rated the experience as positive, engaging, fun, and challenging yet rewarding. Both students and teachers agreed that PBL enhances the development of soft skills crucial for college, including research, teamwork, and oral and written communication. The study concludes that this methodology fosters independent cognitive processes and collaborative learning, effectively preparing students for the real world.
References
National Research Council, Learning and Understan-ding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools, National Academies Press, Washington, 2002.
P. M. Sadler, G. Sonnert, R. H. Tai, K. Klopfenstein, AP: A critical examination of the Advanced Placement program, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, 2010.
R. H. Tai, P. M. Sadler, J. F. Loehr, Advanced Place-ment chemistry exam success and college chemistry performance, College Board Advanced Placement Program Research Report, 2006.
National Research Council, America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science, National Aca-demies Press, Washington, 2006.
H. S. Barrows, R. M. Tamblyn, Problem-based lear-ning: an approach to medical education, Springer Publ., New York, 1980.
L. Torp, S. Sage, Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-12 Education, ASCD Alexandria, Virginia, 1998.
J. Valdez, M. Bungihan, J. Technol. Sci. Educ. 2019, 9, 282, https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.631.
D. Boud, Problem-based Learning in Education for the Professions, Higher Education Research And Deve-lopment Society Of Australia, Australia, 1987.
B. Trilling , P. Hood, Educ. Technol. 1999, 39, 5-18.
J. Ravitz, Peabody Journal of Education 2010, 85, 290-312, https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2010.491432.
J. R. Savery, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 2006, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
J. Barell, Problem-based learning: an inquiry ap-proach, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California, 2007.
B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh , D. E. Allen, The power of problem-based learning: a practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline, Sty-lus, Sterling, Virginia, 2001.
C. Chin, L.-G. Chia, Sci. Ed. 2006, 90, 44-67, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20097.
P. Ram, J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 1122, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p1122.
M. Birenbaum, F. J. R. C. Dochy, eds., Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge, Springer Netherlands, Dordre-cht, 1996.
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, H. S. Barrows, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 2006, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004.
National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Con-cepts, and Core Ideas, National Academies Press, Washington, 2012.
J. R. Savery, T. M. Duffy, Educ. Tech. 1995, 35, 31-38.
G. M. Bodner, J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 873, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873.
E. von Glasersfeld en The International Encyclopedia of Education, vol. 1, (Eds.: T. Husen, T. N. Postlethwaite), Pergamon Press, Oxford/New York, 1986, pp. 162-163.
P. Cobb, Educational Researcher 1994, 23, 13-20, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013.
C. E. Engel en The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (Eds.: D. Boud, G. Feletti), Kogan Page, 2013, pp. 17-27, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042039-3.
J. W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantita-tive, and mixed methods approaches, SAGE Publica-tions, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 2008.
J. W. Creswell, V. L. Plano Clark, M. L. Gutmann, W. E. Hanson en Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, (Eds.: A.Tashakkori, C. Teddlie) SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Califor-nia, 2003, pp. 209-240.
A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie, Handbook of Mixed Met-hods in Social and Behavioral Research, SAGE Pu-blications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2003.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, SAGE Publica-tions, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.
A. Strauss , J. Corbin en Handbook of Qualitative Re-search (Eds.: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln), Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, California, 1994, pp. 273-285.
J. Corbin, A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, 2008.
Y. S. Lincoln, E. G. Guba, Naturalistic inquiry, SAGE, Newbury Park, California, 1985.
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, Educational Psychology Review 2004, 16, 235-266, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
E. E. Virtue, B. N. Hinnant-Crawford, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 2019, 13, https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1809.
J. Barell, Teaching for thoughtfulness: classroom stra-tegies to enhance intellectual development, Longman, New York, 1995.
University at Albany, University Libraries, “Primary and Secondary Sources for Science” disponible en https://library.albany.edu/infolit/resource/prisci, (con-sultado: 28/08/2026).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Anales de Química de la RSEQ